Research Article

Test article submission 2 June 2026

Author
  • Andy Author

This is version 1 of this article, this is the latest verison of this preprint.

This article is a preprint and is currently undergoing peer review by UCL Open: Environment.

Abstract

In recent years, the importance of natural ventilation has been increasingly recognised and achieving a balance between natural ventilation and sound insulation has become a key concern. This study investigates the sound insulation performance of plenum doors – openings designed to achieve both natural ventilation and sound insulation – using the finite element method. In particular, the study examines cases where sound-absorbing materials and micro-perforated panels are inserted into the plenum interior. Previous studies have evaluated the sound insulation performance of plenum doors; however, investigations are limited to specific absorption locations and those involving the introduction of micro-perforated panels have not been conducted. Partial application of sound-absorbing materials and the insertion of micro-perforated panels make it possible to maintain visibility and daylighting. In this way, plenum doors can provide benefits not only in terms of sound insulation but also in visibility and daylight performance. Sound-absorbing materials were applied to the interior surfaces of the plenum, and their effects were especially significant in the mid-to-high-frequency range, with transmission loss increasing by approximately 4–9 dB around 1000 Hz. The degree of improvement was found to increase with the absorption area and coefficient, while differences due to placement location were relatively small, on the order of 0.5–3 dB. The insertion position of the micro-perforated panels was varied and analysed. Microperforated panels were shown to enhance sound transmission loss in specific frequency bands. However, securing a sufficient air back space is essential to achieve this effect. Moreover, the effectiveness of micro-perforated panels depends on installation conditions such as surface area and placement, indicating the need for further evaluation.

Keywords: keyword 1, keyword 2, keyword3, keyword 4

Preprint Under Review

 Open peer review from Lizzy Seal

Review

These are my review comments for the author which will appear publicly online alongside the preprint of this.



Note:
This review refers to round 1 of peer review.

 Open peer review from Ira N as reviewer

Review

Here is my reviewer comments to the author which will be displayed on the public preprint page.



Note:
This review refers to round 1 of peer review.